Washington: la CIA corre ai ripari e la spara grossa:Non sapevano niente e sono stati presi di sorpresa dai discolacci di Facebook. Hanno paura di una vendetta araba che racconti di extraordinary renditions

Il giornalista David Ignatius, in un articolo del 10 febbraio  che cita  fonti della CIA, al punto da sembrarne il portavoce, illustra quanto sia dura la vita per i responsabili della stazione CIA in località come Tunisi o il Cairo o Amman: dover  andare ai cocktails e alle cene o a incontri di collegamento e nel contempo monitorare ( usa il termine spiare) quel che accade nel paese.

Dice che la CIA è stata sorpresa dagli eventi tunisini prima e  egiziani poi . Non spiega però come mai il Presidente degli Stati Uniti, Il segretario di Stato  e il ministro della Difesa, siano stati prodighi di commenti in tempo reale, al punto da sembrare dei radiocronisti. 

O parlavano a vanvera, personalmente ne dubito,  oppure la CIA sapeva e ha fatto il suo mestiere: quello di informare il capo e disinformare gli altri.

La verità è che ad onta di corsi di formazione  e di lingue  gli americani nei paesi arabi  lavorano male: si notano come  gocce d’olio  sull’ acqua, parlano con accenti ridicoli e non riescono a capire la mentalità e qualche volta – in nome del politically correct  – mandano  persone di colore o di religione ebraica, il   che aggiunge  contrasto  e diffidenza.  

Citerò una fonte dei servizi italiani: ”  se incontri un americano che vive all’estero, o è un omosessuale o un agente della CIA. Sono i soli che abbandonano l’adorato  stile di vita  yankee. Uno perché trasgredisce, l’altro per patriottismo.  Qualche volta c’è sovrapposizione.” 

Il giornalista  per giustificare la duplicità di atteggiamento ( e per paura di rivelazioni per ritorsione) la butta sul ridere rifacendosi al famoso libro ” comma 22″ : “se un pilota è pazzo non può volare e deve essere messo a terra. Ma se vuole essere messo a terra, non è pazzo” .  Era la seconda guerra mondiale. 

Adesso la musica è ” se un arabo si sente tradito e si vuole vendicare parlando di extraordinary renditions  o di torutre ordinate da noi, è pazzo. Non credetegli. La verità è un’altra e il Washinton Post  la garantisce.” 

 Godetevi la prosa. Per chi non sa l’inglese, alla fine la colpa è di quel terrorista di  Ben Laden. Li ha distratti e resi dipendenti dalle informazioni  dei servizi arabi alleati. E chiede di alzare la posta( bussano a soldi).

 A de M

In the Middle East, a Catch-22 for the CIA
By David Ignatius
Thursday, February 10, 2011
The CIA uses the term “liaison” to describe its contacts with foreign intelligence services. And in Arab capitals such as Tunis, Cairo and Amman, these relationships can be so seductively beneficial that they limit the CIA’s ability to run its own “unilateral” operations to learn what’s going on inside the host country.
View Only Top Items in This Story
This conundrum – how to work with your hosts and also spy on them – is one of the difficulties facing the CIA as it tries to understand the youth revolution spreading across the Middle East.
The agency has cultivated its relationships with people such as Gen. Omar Suleiman, Egypt’s chief of intelligence and now vice president, but it has not done as well understanding the world of the protesters.
It’s a Catch-22 of the intelligence business, especially over the past decade, when counterterrorism became the CIA’s core mission: The agency needed good relationships with Arab intelligence services to collect information about al-Qaeda, but to maintain those relationships, the agency sometimes avoided local snooping.
The CIA did recruit some long-term contacts within the Egyptian establishment who are said to have provided crucial intelligence in recent days.
But it’s a far cry from the early 1980s, when the Cairo station chief would regularly meet the leader of the Muslim Brotherhood and other opposition groups.
We pulled back more and more, and relied on liaison to let us know what was going on,” says one former station chief who’s a veteran of the CIA’s Near East Division.
These have been trying days for that fabled division, which runs clandestine operations from Morocco to Bangladesh. One agency veteran remembers how “NE” officers would boast to trainees at “the farm”: “We are the elite of the operations directorate! We have the most important targets.”
But this elite status gradually morphed: Not only were the division’s targets important, but so were its liaison partners.
Careers were made on a station chief’s rapport with the head of Jordan’s General Intelligence Department or Egypt’s General Intelligence Service.
An ambitious officer couldn’t afford to have strained relations with his local host.
The problem of dependency became acute after Sept. 11, 2001, when the agency spent many hundreds of millions of dollars bolstering friendly services – especially from authoritarian, pro-American regimes such as Tunisia, Egypt, Jordan, Yemen and Pakistan. Those are the countries now shaken by protest.
Egypt posed a special problem. The military-backed regime was paranoid about foreign spies who might be meeting with domestic opposition figures. The Egyptians maintained such aggressive surveillance that every CIA officer sent there took a special six-week class, known as the “Hostile Environment Tradecraft Course,” to learn how to operate in “denied areas.”
It was a paradox worthy of the sphinx: Even though the United States was spending billions of dollars to assist Egypt and its military, the CIA had to treat Cairo the same way it did Beijing or Moscow.
Thanks to extensive military-to-military contacts and other links, supplemented by clandestine polling, the agency did keep tabs on Egypt – but as the current crisis developed, the United States seemed behind the information curve.
Modern communications technology has aided spying, but it put station chiefs on an electronic leash, limiting the unconventional contacts that might warn what was ahead.
Headquarters was now able to micromanage operations: One chief of the Near East Division sent so many nit-picking messages that he became known as “The Mailman.”
The CIA’s defenders say the agency can juggle liaison and unilateral operations, or as one senior official puts it, “walk and chew gum at the same time.” This official notes that since January 2010, more than 400 of the agency’s 1,700 intelligence reports on the Middle East and North Africa have focused on issues related to stability.
The revolution in Tunisia was a surprise, says this CIA defender, because it “wasn’t clear even to President Ben Ali that his security forces would quickly choose not to support him.” As for Egypt, he says, “analysts anticipated and highlighted the concern that unrest in Tunisia might spread well before demonstrations erupted in Cairo. They later warned that unrest in Egypt would likely gain momentum and could threaten the regime.”
Here’s the bottom line: The CIA is caught in a jam that’s emblematic of America’s larger problem in the Middle East. The agency has been so focused on stopping al-Qaeda that it has been distracted from other questions.
America depends on good intelligence as never before, and the simple truth is that the CIA has to lift its game.

Posta un commento o usa questo indirizzo per il trackback.

Commenti

  • 財布 カードケースス 長財布  Il luglio 8, 2014 alle 3:39 am

    These are in fact fantastic ideas in on the topic of blogging.

    You have touched some nice factors here. Any way keep up wrinting.

  • antoniochedice  Il luglio 8, 2014 alle 9:28 am

    L’ha ribloggato su IL CORRIERE DELLA COLLERAe ha commentato:

    18 febbraio 2011. A leggere dopo Snowden e le sue rivelazioni, c’è da da sganasciarsi dalle risate. Però all’epoca non l’aveva scritto nessuno.

Rispondi

Inserisci i tuoi dati qui sotto o clicca su un'icona per effettuare l'accesso:

Logo di WordPress.com

Stai commentando usando il tuo account WordPress.com. Chiudi sessione /  Modifica )

Google photo

Stai commentando usando il tuo account Google. Chiudi sessione /  Modifica )

Foto Twitter

Stai commentando usando il tuo account Twitter. Chiudi sessione /  Modifica )

Foto di Facebook

Stai commentando usando il tuo account Facebook. Chiudi sessione /  Modifica )

Connessione a %s...

%d blogger hanno fatto clic su Mi Piace per questo: